What comes first? [23.10.2007]

Virginia,

It occured to me that one of the reasons why I seem to breaking things might have to do with a slight difference in our conceptualisation of the blog.

I originally imagined that posts would be driven by markers/locations. Create a marker, which expands into text, images (perhaps more than one) or other types of files i.e. one marker per text entry. In using the blog I realise that it has been conceived from the basis that posts (text/images) come first and location markers second….i.e. create/write the post and then locate it (possibly with more than one location marker). Do I have this right? As I say I'm not sure if this is even a problem... Deb

Comments

virginia [Wed 24 Oct 2007, 1:38am] said:

Deb,

You're exactly right about that - we decided that for long-term flexibility, it would be better to allow multiple points to be associated with a single post (so that we can introduce polylines at some point, for example), which led us to build the system such that a post has a point (or points), rather than the other way around.

But there's no reason you shouldn't maintain a one-post-to-one-point ratio if it suits you to do so. That certainly works with the current setup of the site perfectly well (or, in fact, better than well). Virgina

Only the comment field is required. Omitting the ID fields increases your risk of being mistaken for spam.

Preview or